Connect with us

Vichar

Game Of Strategies, Delhi Election 2020 – Modi vs Kejriwal

Published

on

Game Of Strategies, Delhi Election 2020 – Modi vs Kejriwal

Battle of power at the centre ended on February 11, 2020, where Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) bagged 62 seats out of 70, and Arvind Kejriwal became the Chief Minister of Delhi second time in a row. From the first day of the campaign to the viral ‘baby muffler man’, AAP has managed to steal the hearts of Delhites.

The capital hit the Kejri-wall triumphantly where Bharatiya Janatha Party (BJP) secured only 8 seats. The Legislative election held in New Delhi did put everyone on their edge, one of the main reasons being Modi Vs Kejriwal.

How did Delhi election strategies work?

We did witness parties taking different strategies to win over the hearts of Delhites. At last, the formula applied by AAP proved to be an ultimate successful potion. BJP might have learned lesson 101 from this election. So where did they go wrong? Were they targeting on wrong issues for the wrong audiences?

The Delhi elections were often called out as “Freebies Vs Nationalism” or “Development Vs Communalism”. Not only where the views of Delhiites polarizing, but also were the strategies taken forth by these parties. Aam Aadmi Party focused on local issues faced by localities such as 24*7 availability of water, better education and health, cheapest transportation were some of the promises they kept in front of Delhites. Their strategy of trying to stay away from the polarizing issues happening in Nation-wide help them stay focused.

In contrast, BJP’s trump card was their National achievements. They didn’t manage to pull the chord of the people in Delhi. What Delhi wanted was a leader who notices their root issues and works for state development. BJP failed to promise these aspects and Delhiites did place their power on the one who is all ears for the State.

BJP pinpointed on National issues and achievements on their campaign. They painted the whole future of Delhi by raising issues of National security, Article 370, Shaheen Bagh, CAA and resolution of Ram Mandir.

The question is, what did all this have to do with Delhi’s development? Did all these achievements in any way promise to take this state further?

BJP did slip off to focus on the REAL issues faced by the Delhiites. The polling did show that Delhiites were least concerned with national security and was keener on placing their bet on basic amenities and development. BJP’s campaigns did portray a Hindu – Muslim or sectarian politics that might have backfired them. Either way, it didn’t bring much attention to the Delhiites.

The abolishment of Article 370 was one of the main spotlights of the campaign. They tried to use ‘the Nationalist pride’ cap to win over the heart of Delhites which may not have been entirely successful. The highlighting of Shaheen Bagh and CAA again didn’t do much good for them in elections. Due to the raising of this issue, they might have lost 13 per cent of their votes from the Muslim community.

One of the other disadvantages for BJP was that it didn’t have a CM face which was no match when going against a party whose face is Arvind Kejriwal.

AAP acted as the ears for Delhiites. Arvind Kejriwal exactly knew what to be said, done and acted as spokesperson of Delhi. He placed all his trump cards on the local issues and campaigned on the past five years of achievements that AAP has secured for Delhi. He carried out a ‘post-ideological’ and ‘Delhi’ narrative. He tried not to get tangled up with the polarizing National issues and not to engage on a hatred game with Prime Minister as well as the face of BJP, Narendra Modi.

Kejriwal focused on basic amenities and highlighted water, electricity, schools, and education to be the main agenda of the campaign. He promised to reduce air pollution by planting 20 million trees and boost the use of electric vehicles. He also aims at increasing public transport. During the campaign, AAP’s main focus was on developmental issues. One of their ace cards were in the education sector. They had improved the government school’s infrastructure during their past tenure and promised more autonomy along with betterment. Free water and free electricity was also cherry on the cake for AAP. In all, they did showcase to be a promising future for Delhi by working on their current local issues.

It’s high time for BJP to realize that not only the face of the party matters but when it comes to State elections they need a local leader who aims at the betterment of the state and is ready to untangle the local issues.

Delhiites have voiced their views through their votes. What are your views of the Delhi elections 2020?

I'm an aspiring writer and a passionate daydreamer. I like to spill grey words through my pen and create a positive impact on people. If novels are my door to thousands of lives then coffee is the fuel to my life.

Explainer

All You Need To Know About National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021

Published

on

National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021

On July 26, 2021, Lok Sabha passed a bill under the ministry of Food Processing Industry. The bill is titled as National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Bill, 2021. The main motive of this bill is to address issues with the Food Processing Industry, Entrepreneurship and one Institution for National Importance. With the passing of this bill, the Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology (IIFPT) and National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM) is now merged as Institutions of National Importance, and it aims at providing various research and advancement in learning about the Food Industry and its associated branches. The bill was first introduced in the house in February 2019 but was pending due to protest by the opposition.

Significance of Institutions of National Importance (INI)

With the passing of this bill, the institutions enjoy greater autonomy through which they can carry out various courses, research attracting skilled faculties and students from all over the country and overseas. Good standards in education will be adopted to improve the present and future of education in this branch and sector, overcoming the technological gap in the country. This law aims to improve and introduce new changes in food, bio-nanotechnology, cold chain technology etc. The desired efforts will be taken in terms of human resources and infrastructure developments, labs for research etc. Liberty to open centres anywhere in India is also granted to INI and include courses regarding food technology certification and improving the workforce of the country.

Some other important features of this act are the Institution has been authorized with the Board of Government, Senate and other acting Authorities. The Council of Board will include 16 members from different branches from the same field. The Head will be Chairperson, who will be a skilled person from the Food Industry, the Director, Dean and Registrar. Members appointed from Centre and State Governments, Members from FSSAI and Council of Agriculture Research, as mentioned in the bill. The 16 members of the board will carry out work of taking administrative decisions, creating annual budgets and paths for institution progress as an organization, establishing departments, their appointment terms of services, faculties etc. The Board of Council also holds power to grant Honorary Degrees and Diplomas. The Senate shall be the principal academic body of the Institute, consisting of the people such as Director as the Chairperson; Registrar; Full-time skilled level Professor; and Three academically skilled Individuals nominated by the board from the field.

The Union Minister of Food Processing Industry, Mr Pashupati Kumar Paras, expressed his gratitude to PM Modi for this landmark step in this industry from his Twitter handle, indicating new opportunities in Food Technology Industries. Therefore, this Act looks promising on paper with new opportunities and in Educational Development. Amidst the Pegasus Spyware and repeal of the farm laws, this looks positive from the Modi Government.

Continue Reading

Vichar

Fake News: Accountability Of News Organisations

Published

on

Fake News II News Aur Chai

Fake news is false news stories or hoaxes, which are deliberately released to misinform and to create chaos in society or among readers. Fake news is one of the main reasons behind the disruption of peace in society and it becomes more dangerous in volatile places. Fake news is generally shared with propaganda to mislead the audience by hiding or twisting the truth. However fake news isn’t new to the web, it recently became an enormous problem in today’s digital world. Fake news mostly comes from sites that are bogus or have sensationalized stories.

Most of the users do not check the facts before sharing the information on their social media, which can be a reason for widespread fake news. So, it is important to differentiate between fake news and authentic news to maintain harmony in society and to avoid false news and its repercussions.

Fake News Stories

  • On 2nd April, a team of doctors, health workers, and revenue officials were attacked by the family members of a 65-year-old man who died of COVID-19 in Indore, Madhya Pradesh because of the fake video which claimed that healthy Muslims were being injected with the virus, reiterating the risks and physical manifestations of misinformation.
  • On March 22, 2020, Mr. Modi’s new term ‘Janta curfew’ has sparked a buzz on the Internet. Social media users started interpreting PM Modi’s concept of ‘Janta curfew’ in their own ways. Social media was flooded with a certain ‘scientific explanation’ behind the curfew as to how it will break the chain of transmissions of the deadly coronavirus infection. The claim was found out to be misleading. PM Modi, while announcing the curfew, didn’t mention this particular ‘scientific’ logic behind it.
  • Rumours were circulated on WhatsApp groups about a kidnapping gang operating in India’s western state of Maharashtra in 2018. The rumors eventually cause a mob lynching, that killed five migrant workers because they were suspected of being kidnappers.
  • On November 13, 2016, when the government of India has demonetized Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes and planned to replace them with new Rs 500 and Rs 2000 notes, rumors were spreading about Rs 2000 notes. Rumors claimed the new higher denomination currency comes with a Nano-GPS chip which acts as a reflector, giving precise location coordinates of the currency to permit every note to be tracked. However, the RBI officials had dismissed these as false and said the new Rs 2000 note does not have a Nano-GPS chip as is being claimed on social media, WhatsApp.
  • In the pandemic situation, where vaccination has become crucial, in a series of viral videos it was seen that people are claiming that magnet was attracted to the arms of alleged COVID-19 vaccinated recipients. This kind of fake news can create misconceptions about vaccines and people may not take their jab of vaccines. The Centre has declined the claims that Covid-19 vaccines can make people ‘magnetic’. It has also dismissed theories about microchips in coronavirus vaccines.

Need of Accountability

False information on social media can cause huge problems. It is often done to influence political processes. Need for Accountability increases in such situations because the false information provided by certain news organizations can create a ruckus in society. Before publishing the news, it is necessary to check the facts.

If the news organizations, shared misinformation unintentionally they must remove the content right away and they should apologize to the readers. If fake news is spread with propaganda to create chaos in society, then the news organization should be punished under the law. The information must be checked before sharing it with other people.

 

Continue Reading

Explainer

Curious Case Of Pegasus: Explained

Published

on

Pegasus II News Aur Chai

Pegasus is a spyware that can hack the victims’ mobile phones and read their SMS messages and emails. The Pegasus spyware is owned by an Israeli software company named NSO Group. According to the various reports, this company has targeted more than 50,000 phone numbers at the Global level, of which 300 are in India for surveillance.

The news broke out after the 17 media partners investigated. This investigation brought into the picture information about a leaked database of mobile telephone numbers of Indian Ministers, Opposition leaders, journalists, the legal community, business people, government officials, scientists, activists and many influential personalities of the nation.

Pegasus Spyware and India

According to the report by the agency, the Israeli company which sells Pegasus around the world says that its clients are confined to ‘vetted governments”, believed to number 36. The NSO Group also says that ‘the target list in India is not ours, never was.’ Their refusal of the leaked database has created a loophole in understanding this case.

This whole case has violated the integrity of democratic institutions. According to the report by the agencies, after the mobile phones of the opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and various other leaders were hacked under the Pegasus spyware surveillance. Multiple tweets were made against the Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) government in India. This whole case has become one of the major threats in the political arena and the Indian Democracy.

Though at the start, it was used for national security purposes. The explosive expansion of surveillance technology vendors has become a vast human rights and a global security issue. If such surveillance technologies increase, it might cause a lot of problems to countries around the globe. Hence, as a precaution, all these countries need to work on regulating this technology.

According to the reports by the agency, one of the targeted phones by the Pegasus spyware was of the former election commissioner of India, Ashok Lavasa. Various such people and such opposition leaders were somehow against the BJP government having their phones hacked with the NSO-owned spyware. All these instances and the names in the leaked list have pointed figures towards the Modi Government.

The Modi government’s stand on this case was put forward in Lok Sabha by two serving ministers, Ashwini Vaishnaw and Prahlad Singh Patel. These two leaders were also featured in the leaked database. The recent Information Technology Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw defended the BJP government in the parliament by saying, “the expose was an attempt to malign Indian democracy and its well-established institutions.” She even said, ‘any form of illegal surveillance is not possible with the checks and balances in our laws and robust institutions.’

This case has adjourned the parliament proceedings due to the protests inside and outside the house of parliament by the opposition party.

Pegasus Spyware and World.

 In the statement given to the agency, Access Now, an organisation defending the digital rights of global users, said it was outraged that products sold by NSO were allegedly “used to hack and invade the private communications” of thousands of people across the globe.

At a global level, France’s Emmanuel Macron was targeted in the Pegasus spyware case. As the phone of French President Emmanuel Macron was hacked, the investigation was carried out and later on was published which was directed by the Paris-based non-profit journalism group Forbidden.  After this case came in front of the whole world, the Pegasus spyware surveillance came into the picture.

If this continues for some more time, it will ruin India’s Democratic values at a global level. As well as this might become a huge technological threat between the different nations around the globe.

Continue Reading

Most Popular