Connect with us

Explainer

All You Need To Know About NBFID Bill, 2021

Published

on

The National Bank For Financing Infrastructure And Development Bill 2021 (NBFID Bill) | News Aur Chai

On March 25, 2021, Rajya Sabha passed a Bill, by voice vote, to establish a statutory institution called the National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NBFID). The Bill was passed after a response from the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala Sitharaman. The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development Bill (NBFID), 2021 was introduced in Lok Sabha on March 22, 2021, and was passed in the Lok Sabha on March 23, 2021.

Sitharaman stated that the Institution’s audited accounts would be presented to both the Houses every year, and they will have an “oversight”.

What Is The NBFID Bill?

The Bill aims to establish an NBFID to support ‘infrastructure funding’ in the country. This would work as the primary Development Financial Institution (DFI). It involves the development of bond and futures markets, which are essential for infrastructure financing.

What Exactly Is The National Bank For Financing Infrastructure And Development?

NBFID will be established as a statutory organization, where it will have an authorized shareholding of Rs. 1 lakh crore and financial and developmental targets. It will catalyze the infrastructure financing ecosystem and be accountable to the Parliament.

The NBFID will be administered by the Chairman and Board-nominated professionals who the Government will choose.

The shares of NBFID can be held by:

  1. Central Government,
  2. Multilateral Institutions,
  3. Sovereign wealth funds,
  4. Pension funds,
  5. Insurers,
  6. Financial Institutions,
  7. Banks and
  8. Any other institute prescribed by the Government.

Objectives Of NBFID

NBFID will have financial objectives along with developmental objectives. The financial objectives include lending, investing, or drawing investments directly or indirectly for India’s infrastructure projects, whether entirely or partially. The Central Government will state the infrastructure domain, which will determine the sectors that will be covered. The developmental objectives include facilitating the growth of the bond, loan, and derivatives markets to fund infrastructure.

Functions Of NBFID

  1. Extending loans and advances for infrastructure projects;
  2. Taking over or refinancing such existing loans;
  3. Attracting investment from private sector investors and institutional investors for infrastructure projects;
  4. Organizing and facilitating foreign participation in infrastructure projects;
  5. Facilitating negotiations with various Government authorities for dispute resolution in the field of infrastructure financing and
  6. Providing consultancy services in infrastructure financing.

What Will Be The Source Of Funds?

NBFID can obtain money by loans or other sources, in both Indian rupees and foreign currencies, or by issuing and selling a range of financial instruments, such as bonds and debentures.

It may remortgage from:

  1. Central Government,
  2. Reserve Bank of India (RBI),
  3. Scheduled commercial banks,
  4. Mutual funds, and
  5. Multilateral institutions, such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

What Is A Developmental Financial Institution (DFI)?

DFIs are established to offer long-term financing to sectors of the economy where the costs are too high for commercial banks and other financial institutions to bear. They do not accept deposits from citizens. Instead, they rely on the market, the Government and multilateral organizations for financing. They are often backed up by Government assurances.

Administration Of NBFID

The Board of Directors will oversee the operations of NBFID.

The members of the Board include:

  1. The Chairperson appointed by the Central Government in consultation with RBI,
  2. A Managing Director,
  3. Up to three Deputy Managing Directors,
  4. Two directors nominated by the Central Government,
  5. Up to three directors elected by shareholders and
  6. Few independent directors (as specified).
  7. Candidates for the position of Managing Director and Deputy Managing Directors will be advised by a body set up by the Government. On the advice of an internal committee, the Board will name independent directors.

What Is The Opposition Saying?

Opposition members strongly argued that the Bill should be sent to the Select Committee as it did not include “external oversight or surveillance” in its current form.

Senior Congress leader, Mr Jairam Ramesh, sparked off the debate by saying that the concept of DFIs had already been tried, checked, and rejected. He said, “Thirty years after Dr Manmohan Singh’s Budget, the clock has turned back and we are going back to the DFI era.” Although the Government owns a 26 per cent interest in this bank, the Bill lacks an oversight mechanism. He also rebuked the Government for failing to send the Bill to a Committee of Parliament.

Mr Manoj K. Jha, a JD MP, expressed disappointment that the Government, despite only owning a 26 per cent share, is willing to sell a 74 per cent stake.

The Bill was supported by members of the Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, and Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress, among others.

What Did Nirmala Sitharaman Say?

Ms Sitharaman claimed that the NBFID was desperately needed and would be for the next 25 years in India’s development narrative. It intended to finance not only road infrastructure but also social infrastructures such as schools and hospitals. It will be a professionally managed body, with the Chairperson appointed solely by the Government. She said the Bill enclosed safeguards such as requiring the NBFID to send a copy of its balance sheet and accounts, as well as a copy of the auditor’s report and a report on the Institution’s activities during the relevant year, to the Central Government and the RBI within four months of the date on which its accounts were closed and balanced. Every year, these reports will be presented to both Houses of Parliament.

Nirmala Sitharaman said, “Parliament’s oversight annually is envisaged and built into the Act itself.”

You won’t find Rushika far from her earphones as she always needs to have music playing in the background while working. She is a Media Student who wishes to put her beliefs and views out into the world and bring a fresh eye to a subject. Apart from that, she is really passionate about travelling, reading and writing.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Explainer

All You Need To Know About National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021

Published

on

National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021

On July 26, 2021, Lok Sabha passed a bill under the ministry of Food Processing Industry. The bill is titled as National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Bill, 2021. The main motive of this bill is to address issues with the Food Processing Industry, Entrepreneurship and one Institution for National Importance. With the passing of this bill, the Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology (IIFPT) and National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM) is now merged as Institutions of National Importance, and it aims at providing various research and advancement in learning about the Food Industry and its associated branches. The bill was first introduced in the house in February 2019 but was pending due to protest by the opposition.

Significance of Institutions of National Importance (INI)

With the passing of this bill, the institutions enjoy greater autonomy through which they can carry out various courses, research attracting skilled faculties and students from all over the country and overseas. Good standards in education will be adopted to improve the present and future of education in this branch and sector, overcoming the technological gap in the country. This law aims to improve and introduce new changes in food, bio-nanotechnology, cold chain technology etc. The desired efforts will be taken in terms of human resources and infrastructure developments, labs for research etc. Liberty to open centres anywhere in India is also granted to INI and include courses regarding food technology certification and improving the workforce of the country.

Some other important features of this act are the Institution has been authorized with the Board of Government, Senate and other acting Authorities. The Council of Board will include 16 members from different branches from the same field. The Head will be Chairperson, who will be a skilled person from the Food Industry, the Director, Dean and Registrar. Members appointed from Centre and State Governments, Members from FSSAI and Council of Agriculture Research, as mentioned in the bill. The 16 members of the board will carry out work of taking administrative decisions, creating annual budgets and paths for institution progress as an organization, establishing departments, their appointment terms of services, faculties etc. The Board of Council also holds power to grant Honorary Degrees and Diplomas. The Senate shall be the principal academic body of the Institute, consisting of the people such as Director as the Chairperson; Registrar; Full-time skilled level Professor; and Three academically skilled Individuals nominated by the board from the field.

The Union Minister of Food Processing Industry, Mr Pashupati Kumar Paras, expressed his gratitude to PM Modi for this landmark step in this industry from his Twitter handle, indicating new opportunities in Food Technology Industries. Therefore, this Act looks promising on paper with new opportunities and in Educational Development. Amidst the Pegasus Spyware and repeal of the farm laws, this looks positive from the Modi Government.

Continue Reading

Explainer

Curious Case Of Pegasus: Explained

Published

on

Pegasus II News Aur Chai

Pegasus is a spyware that can hack the victims’ mobile phones and read their SMS messages and emails. The Pegasus spyware is owned by an Israeli software company named NSO Group. According to the various reports, this company has targeted more than 50,000 phone numbers at the Global level, of which 300 are in India for surveillance.

The news broke out after the 17 media partners investigated. This investigation brought into the picture information about a leaked database of mobile telephone numbers of Indian Ministers, Opposition leaders, journalists, the legal community, business people, government officials, scientists, activists and many influential personalities of the nation.

Pegasus Spyware and India

According to the report by the agency, the Israeli company which sells Pegasus around the world says that its clients are confined to ‘vetted governments”, believed to number 36. The NSO Group also says that ‘the target list in India is not ours, never was.’ Their refusal of the leaked database has created a loophole in understanding this case.

This whole case has violated the integrity of democratic institutions. According to the report by the agencies, after the mobile phones of the opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and various other leaders were hacked under the Pegasus spyware surveillance. Multiple tweets were made against the Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) government in India. This whole case has become one of the major threats in the political arena and the Indian Democracy.

Though at the start, it was used for national security purposes. The explosive expansion of surveillance technology vendors has become a vast human rights and a global security issue. If such surveillance technologies increase, it might cause a lot of problems to countries around the globe. Hence, as a precaution, all these countries need to work on regulating this technology.

According to the reports by the agency, one of the targeted phones by the Pegasus spyware was of the former election commissioner of India, Ashok Lavasa. Various such people and such opposition leaders were somehow against the BJP government having their phones hacked with the NSO-owned spyware. All these instances and the names in the leaked list have pointed figures towards the Modi Government.

The Modi government’s stand on this case was put forward in Lok Sabha by two serving ministers, Ashwini Vaishnaw and Prahlad Singh Patel. These two leaders were also featured in the leaked database. The recent Information Technology Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw defended the BJP government in the parliament by saying, “the expose was an attempt to malign Indian democracy and its well-established institutions.” She even said, ‘any form of illegal surveillance is not possible with the checks and balances in our laws and robust institutions.’

This case has adjourned the parliament proceedings due to the protests inside and outside the house of parliament by the opposition party.

Pegasus Spyware and World.

 In the statement given to the agency, Access Now, an organisation defending the digital rights of global users, said it was outraged that products sold by NSO were allegedly “used to hack and invade the private communications” of thousands of people across the globe.

At a global level, France’s Emmanuel Macron was targeted in the Pegasus spyware case. As the phone of French President Emmanuel Macron was hacked, the investigation was carried out and later on was published which was directed by the Paris-based non-profit journalism group Forbidden.  After this case came in front of the whole world, the Pegasus spyware surveillance came into the picture.

If this continues for some more time, it will ruin India’s Democratic values at a global level. As well as this might become a huge technological threat between the different nations around the globe.

Continue Reading

Featured

Modi Cabinet 2.0: Young and Dynamic Leadership or Otherwise

Published

on

Cabinet II News Aur Chai

On the 7th of July, the union government announced the biggest cabinet expansion in the 7 years of NDA rule. The recent expansion increased the size of the Council of Ministers from 53 to 77. About 43 new ministers were sworn in, 15 of which were Cabinet Ministers and 28 Ministers of State (MoS). This is the first cabinet overhaul in the second term of NDA governance.

Experts however claim that the new cabinet expansion is a pre-emptive measure to balance electoral formulae in different states ahead of the 2022 State Assembly elections. It is also conjectured that the reshuffle comes as rectification of prolonged criticism about BJP’s governance in the past 2 years, including the Healthcare management during the Pandemic.

The Performance Paradox

This recent cabinet expansion is a report card of the BJP government’s performance in the last 2 years. Major ministerial changes, such as the resignation and replacement of Dr. Harshvardhan as the Health Minister indicate a confession of their mismanagement of the pandemic.

He has been replaced by Mansukh Mandaviya, a 2 time Rajya Sabha MP who has also been awarded by the UN for initiatives in Women’s healthcare in the past. His appointment as the Health Minister is one of hope for BJP, to change and streamline (a.) the COVID-19 Pandemic response and (b.) BJP’s image in the name of healthcare management.

On the contrary, Anurag Thakur’s promotion from MoS Finance to a Cabinet Minister defies all logical explanations for awarding performance. Not only has India’s economic condition worsened under his management, his controversial statements like “Desh ke Gadaaro ko…” do not present a strong case for him. His appointment is a political investment by BJP in Himachal Pradesh’s state elections next year which happens to be Thakur’s home state.

Similarly, Sitharaman’s finance ministry has remained untouched, after historical mismanagement of our Finance capabilities. All of this reflects a selective approach adopted by BJP, which is one of political hesitation and hyperopic ignorance.

BJP’s Political Calculator

Apart from the ‘punishment’ narrative, the new cabinet expansion has also given an insight into BJP’s political planning.  This expansion has incorporated key leaders from several states that go to elections next year. Moreover, it has also been carefully planned to cover the losses BJP has incurred in the past two years.

As a reward for dismantling the elected Madhya Pradesh government and tipping scales in BJP’s favor, Jyotiraditya Scindia was appointed as the Cabinet Minister for Civil Aviation (a post held by his father as well in ’91) almost after 3 years.

On the contrary, Pashupati Kumar Paras got an early reward for breaking down Lok Janshakti Party’s (LJP) representation in Lok Sabha. He was appointed as the Union Minister for Food Processing, after the attempted coup on Chirag Paswan’s leadership.

Sarbananda Sonowal, who was replaced by Himanta Biswa Sharma as the Chief Minister of Assam after the fresh elections, was also awarded a berth in the Cabinet. It is conjectured that this development was in talks ever since Himanta Biswa Sharma was chosen as the CM.

As the Uttar Pradesh elections near, BJP also made sure to improve representation from the state. Major appointments such as Niranjan Jyoti (MoS Food Processing), Anupriya Patel (Mos Commerce and Industry), and Bhanu Pratap Singh Verma (MoS MSME) were made majorly because of their heavy support base in UP.

Following the same lead, Ajay Bhatt from Uttarakhand was appointed as MoS Defence and Tourism. As seen earlier, BJP has made major organizational changes in Uttarakhand which goes to elections next year.

Some Positives

In the mirage of calculated placements and image reconstruction, BJP has hit a few rights with this organizational change. The new cabinet includes a maximum number of women to have ever served in a Union Cabinet, a first in a nation with largely patriarchal tendencies.

The cabinet has also tried to focus on bringing people with commendable background experience and education on board. Ashwini Vaishnav, former IAS and an alumnus of Wharton School have been given major ministries such as Railways, Communications, and IT. Similarly, Anupriya Patel who has been given the Commerce and Industry as an MoS has also served as an educator at Amity University.

Moreover, the diffused reliance on regional strength has become the overarching theme in this cabinet reshuffle. Even though the ruling party intends to balance the voter dynamics, this regional unity has become something to watch out for.

Yet, the big story remains the ouster of major politicians who have served loyally and faithfully to this government. Ravi Shankar Prasad, Prakash Jaavedkar, and Dr. Harshvardhan are major losers in this dynamic reshuffle. While the current government has tried to modernize the leaders of this nation, it has set a new precedent that loyalty is not the most critical virtue anymore; Election Commission’s schedule is.

Continue Reading

Most Popular