Connect with us


Here Is Why NGOs And Opposition Oppose FCRA Amendment Bill 2020



What Does FCRA Amendment Bill 2020 Means For India?

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill 2020 (FCRA), passed in Lok Sabha, and Rajya Sabha, on September 21 and 23 respectively, with a view of increasing transparency in the working of an organization receiving foreign funds. The bill is receiving backslash from the NGOs and the Opposition with regards to the encroachment of NGOs financial administration.

What was the initial Act?

The decision of amendment comes with the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) of 2010, which has been amended twice. The Initial FCRA was enacted to regulate and prohibit the acceptance and utilization of foreign contribution such as transfer of any currency, security, or article for any activities detrimental to “national interest.” The Act applies to all associations, organizations, group which intend to obtain foreign donations. It also mandates the respective organization to register within FCRA for receiving donations on cultural, educational, economic, and religious goals. Political parties are not eligible for the same.

What changes with FCRA 2020 Amendment?

  1. The highlighting feature of the amendment is the reduction in utilization of foreign funds in the administration of the organization from 50 per cent to 20 per cent. The Government described the move as a step to ensure compliance and transparency with proper utilization of foreign funds.
  2. The Act prohibits the transfer of foreign contributions to any individual, association, or a registered company, causing an uproar from NGOs and Oppositions.
  3. Another key variation is the compulsory Aadhaar registration of all its office bearers, directors, or crucial functionaries for identification purposes, thus increase the existing burden of registrations.
  4. Every person who has been given a certificate of registration must renew the certification within six months of expiration. The Government may conduct an inquiry before renewal to ensure that the person making the application: (i) is not fictitious or benami, (ii) has not been prosecuted or convicted for creating communal tension or indulging in activities aimed at religious conversion, and (iii) has not been found guilty of diversion or misutilisation of funds, among others conditions.
  5. The Act empowers the Government to ask an organization to not use the funds by holding a “summary inquiry.” Earlier it was supposed to be done only after the person or association has been “found guilty” of violation of the Act.
  6. FCRA account has to be made with State Bank of India New Delhi, whereby the Government can monitor the flow of money.
  7. It also extends the period of suspension of registration of a person by the Government from the present limit of 180 days by up to an additional 180 days.

NGOs, Oppositions, and criticisms:

It is no doubt that the Civil Society plays a more prominent role in public welfare. Given the times of pandemic, the combination of Government and civil society helped to protect humanity. The restrictions levied by the Act may limit the existing NGOs will to serve the public. NGO as a sector already reports to several authorities, given its nature.

  1. The Act allows the Government to capture and scrutinize small details like change in a bank account or address.
  2. The reduction in use of foreign contribution for administrative purposes from 50 per cent to 20 per cent is unfavorable concerning the NGOs working for research and health. In times like COVID-19, the sector needs more relaxation than restrictions.
  3. The largescale NGOs are arguing onto the fact that they transfer funds to the smallscale based organization which doesn’t have any parent support of donations. Grassroots organizations with the help of Large NGOs funds facilitated the fight of social, economic, educational, environmental issues.
  4. The Opposition is looking onto the Act as a way for “Hindutva.” It is no mystery that the majority of foreign funds are received by Christian NGOs, a minority in India.
  5. The Opposition also calls out to Government on “PM fund cares” which is exempted from the Act, meaning, no question on the amount of the foreign funds received into the same.
  6. In 2019, Central Bureau Investigation raided the Amnesty International’s offices on account of FCRA violation. Notably, Amnesty was vocal against human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir after the Government revoked special status under Article 370.

VANI the apex body for civil society organization, in a statement put forward why NGOs are opposing the FCRA bill 2020.

Government’s Justification:

In 2015, an interesting statistic by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) showed that there are 31 lakh NGOs in India, which is more than double the number of schools and 205 times more than the number of hospitals in the country. It stated that one NGO covers 400 people as against one policeman for 709 people.

The CBI also informed that only 8-10 per cent of these NGOs had filed their financial records with the Registrar of Societies (RoS) detailing receipt and spending of funds.

This alerted the Government, and in 2016 the Supreme Court directed to amend the FCRA Act, which led to the draconian steps by the Government.

The Government, in its stance, asserted that amendments aren’t against the NGOs but against the ones misusing the foreign funds with an attempt to hide their identity. The standpoint of maintaining and protecting internal security by examining the kinds of funds and their utilization within our sovereign body is also very crucial.

In a recent parliamentary debate, Minister of State for Home, Nityanand Rai quoted former finance minister P Chidambaram who had told Parliament earlier that “about Rs 20,000 crore funding was received by NGOs but nobody knew where did the Rs 10,000 crore out of it, go.”

The bill which is passed by the Parliament will now go for the President’s assent.

The fundamental of having two houses in our parliamentary system is to have an intensive discussion on a bill, formation, and adherence of public opinion. The current Parliament session has seen many controversial amendments which are being questioned by the public and opposition. Nation will have to wait and see how the implementation of these bills will take place and how Indians will actually be affected.

Continue Reading


All You Need To Know About National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021



National Institute Of Food Technology Entrepreneurship And Management Bill 2021

On July 26, 2021, Lok Sabha passed a bill under the ministry of Food Processing Industry. The bill is titled as National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Bill, 2021. The main motive of this bill is to address issues with the Food Processing Industry, Entrepreneurship and one Institution for National Importance. With the passing of this bill, the Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology (IIFPT) and National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM) is now merged as Institutions of National Importance, and it aims at providing various research and advancement in learning about the Food Industry and its associated branches. The bill was first introduced in the house in February 2019 but was pending due to protest by the opposition.

Significance of Institutions of National Importance (INI)

With the passing of this bill, the institutions enjoy greater autonomy through which they can carry out various courses, research attracting skilled faculties and students from all over the country and overseas. Good standards in education will be adopted to improve the present and future of education in this branch and sector, overcoming the technological gap in the country. This law aims to improve and introduce new changes in food, bio-nanotechnology, cold chain technology etc. The desired efforts will be taken in terms of human resources and infrastructure developments, labs for research etc. Liberty to open centres anywhere in India is also granted to INI and include courses regarding food technology certification and improving the workforce of the country.

Some other important features of this act are the Institution has been authorized with the Board of Government, Senate and other acting Authorities. The Council of Board will include 16 members from different branches from the same field. The Head will be Chairperson, who will be a skilled person from the Food Industry, the Director, Dean and Registrar. Members appointed from Centre and State Governments, Members from FSSAI and Council of Agriculture Research, as mentioned in the bill. The 16 members of the board will carry out work of taking administrative decisions, creating annual budgets and paths for institution progress as an organization, establishing departments, their appointment terms of services, faculties etc. The Board of Council also holds power to grant Honorary Degrees and Diplomas. The Senate shall be the principal academic body of the Institute, consisting of the people such as Director as the Chairperson; Registrar; Full-time skilled level Professor; and Three academically skilled Individuals nominated by the board from the field.

The Union Minister of Food Processing Industry, Mr Pashupati Kumar Paras, expressed his gratitude to PM Modi for this landmark step in this industry from his Twitter handle, indicating new opportunities in Food Technology Industries. Therefore, this Act looks promising on paper with new opportunities and in Educational Development. Amidst the Pegasus Spyware and repeal of the farm laws, this looks positive from the Modi Government.

Continue Reading


Curious Case Of Pegasus: Explained



Pegasus II News Aur Chai

Pegasus is a spyware that can hack the victims’ mobile phones and read their SMS messages and emails. The Pegasus spyware is owned by an Israeli software company named NSO Group. According to the various reports, this company has targeted more than 50,000 phone numbers at the Global level, of which 300 are in India for surveillance.

The news broke out after the 17 media partners investigated. This investigation brought into the picture information about a leaked database of mobile telephone numbers of Indian Ministers, Opposition leaders, journalists, the legal community, business people, government officials, scientists, activists and many influential personalities of the nation.

Pegasus Spyware and India

According to the report by the agency, the Israeli company which sells Pegasus around the world says that its clients are confined to ‘vetted governments”, believed to number 36. The NSO Group also says that ‘the target list in India is not ours, never was.’ Their refusal of the leaked database has created a loophole in understanding this case.

This whole case has violated the integrity of democratic institutions. According to the report by the agencies, after the mobile phones of the opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and various other leaders were hacked under the Pegasus spyware surveillance. Multiple tweets were made against the Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) government in India. This whole case has become one of the major threats in the political arena and the Indian Democracy.

Though at the start, it was used for national security purposes. The explosive expansion of surveillance technology vendors has become a vast human rights and a global security issue. If such surveillance technologies increase, it might cause a lot of problems to countries around the globe. Hence, as a precaution, all these countries need to work on regulating this technology.

According to the reports by the agency, one of the targeted phones by the Pegasus spyware was of the former election commissioner of India, Ashok Lavasa. Various such people and such opposition leaders were somehow against the BJP government having their phones hacked with the NSO-owned spyware. All these instances and the names in the leaked list have pointed figures towards the Modi Government.

The Modi government’s stand on this case was put forward in Lok Sabha by two serving ministers, Ashwini Vaishnaw and Prahlad Singh Patel. These two leaders were also featured in the leaked database. The recent Information Technology Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw defended the BJP government in the parliament by saying, “the expose was an attempt to malign Indian democracy and its well-established institutions.” She even said, ‘any form of illegal surveillance is not possible with the checks and balances in our laws and robust institutions.’

This case has adjourned the parliament proceedings due to the protests inside and outside the house of parliament by the opposition party.

Pegasus Spyware and World.

 In the statement given to the agency, Access Now, an organisation defending the digital rights of global users, said it was outraged that products sold by NSO were allegedly “used to hack and invade the private communications” of thousands of people across the globe.

At a global level, France’s Emmanuel Macron was targeted in the Pegasus spyware case. As the phone of French President Emmanuel Macron was hacked, the investigation was carried out and later on was published which was directed by the Paris-based non-profit journalism group Forbidden.  After this case came in front of the whole world, the Pegasus spyware surveillance came into the picture.

If this continues for some more time, it will ruin India’s Democratic values at a global level. As well as this might become a huge technological threat between the different nations around the globe.

Continue Reading


Modi Cabinet 2.0: Young and Dynamic Leadership or Otherwise



Cabinet II News Aur Chai

On the 7th of July, the union government announced the biggest cabinet expansion in the 7 years of NDA rule. The recent expansion increased the size of the Council of Ministers from 53 to 77. About 43 new ministers were sworn in, 15 of which were Cabinet Ministers and 28 Ministers of State (MoS). This is the first cabinet overhaul in the second term of NDA governance.

Experts however claim that the new cabinet expansion is a pre-emptive measure to balance electoral formulae in different states ahead of the 2022 State Assembly elections. It is also conjectured that the reshuffle comes as rectification of prolonged criticism about BJP’s governance in the past 2 years, including the Healthcare management during the Pandemic.

The Performance Paradox

This recent cabinet expansion is a report card of the BJP government’s performance in the last 2 years. Major ministerial changes, such as the resignation and replacement of Dr. Harshvardhan as the Health Minister indicate a confession of their mismanagement of the pandemic.

He has been replaced by Mansukh Mandaviya, a 2 time Rajya Sabha MP who has also been awarded by the UN for initiatives in Women’s healthcare in the past. His appointment as the Health Minister is one of hope for BJP, to change and streamline (a.) the COVID-19 Pandemic response and (b.) BJP’s image in the name of healthcare management.

On the contrary, Anurag Thakur’s promotion from MoS Finance to a Cabinet Minister defies all logical explanations for awarding performance. Not only has India’s economic condition worsened under his management, his controversial statements like “Desh ke Gadaaro ko…” do not present a strong case for him. His appointment is a political investment by BJP in Himachal Pradesh’s state elections next year which happens to be Thakur’s home state.

Similarly, Sitharaman’s finance ministry has remained untouched, after historical mismanagement of our Finance capabilities. All of this reflects a selective approach adopted by BJP, which is one of political hesitation and hyperopic ignorance.

BJP’s Political Calculator

Apart from the ‘punishment’ narrative, the new cabinet expansion has also given an insight into BJP’s political planning.  This expansion has incorporated key leaders from several states that go to elections next year. Moreover, it has also been carefully planned to cover the losses BJP has incurred in the past two years.

As a reward for dismantling the elected Madhya Pradesh government and tipping scales in BJP’s favor, Jyotiraditya Scindia was appointed as the Cabinet Minister for Civil Aviation (a post held by his father as well in ’91) almost after 3 years.

On the contrary, Pashupati Kumar Paras got an early reward for breaking down Lok Janshakti Party’s (LJP) representation in Lok Sabha. He was appointed as the Union Minister for Food Processing, after the attempted coup on Chirag Paswan’s leadership.

Sarbananda Sonowal, who was replaced by Himanta Biswa Sharma as the Chief Minister of Assam after the fresh elections, was also awarded a berth in the Cabinet. It is conjectured that this development was in talks ever since Himanta Biswa Sharma was chosen as the CM.

As the Uttar Pradesh elections near, BJP also made sure to improve representation from the state. Major appointments such as Niranjan Jyoti (MoS Food Processing), Anupriya Patel (Mos Commerce and Industry), and Bhanu Pratap Singh Verma (MoS MSME) were made majorly because of their heavy support base in UP.

Following the same lead, Ajay Bhatt from Uttarakhand was appointed as MoS Defence and Tourism. As seen earlier, BJP has made major organizational changes in Uttarakhand which goes to elections next year.

Some Positives

In the mirage of calculated placements and image reconstruction, BJP has hit a few rights with this organizational change. The new cabinet includes a maximum number of women to have ever served in a Union Cabinet, a first in a nation with largely patriarchal tendencies.

The cabinet has also tried to focus on bringing people with commendable background experience and education on board. Ashwini Vaishnav, former IAS and an alumnus of Wharton School have been given major ministries such as Railways, Communications, and IT. Similarly, Anupriya Patel who has been given the Commerce and Industry as an MoS has also served as an educator at Amity University.

Moreover, the diffused reliance on regional strength has become the overarching theme in this cabinet reshuffle. Even though the ruling party intends to balance the voter dynamics, this regional unity has become something to watch out for.

Yet, the big story remains the ouster of major politicians who have served loyally and faithfully to this government. Ravi Shankar Prasad, Prakash Jaavedkar, and Dr. Harshvardhan are major losers in this dynamic reshuffle. While the current government has tried to modernize the leaders of this nation, it has set a new precedent that loyalty is not the most critical virtue anymore; Election Commission’s schedule is.

Continue Reading

Most Popular